Daniel Meyerowitz-Katz, Barrister

DANIEL MEYEROWITZ-KATZ

BARRISTER

  • Home

  • CV

  • Contact

  • Blog

  • More

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
    • All Posts
    • Policy
    • Case notes
    • Practical tips
    • Submissions
    • Practical tips for barristers
    • Misc
    Search
    Daniel Meyerowitz-Katz
    • Oct 17, 2018
    • 8 min

    High Court split over two bites of the cherry

    In UBS AG v Tyne [2018] HCA 45, a 4-3 decision of the High Court of Australia has made it harder for litigants to bring a claim that could have been determined in an earlier proceeding, even if that claim had never been determined on the merits. The decision rested on the interpretation of the doctrine of the abuse of the court's process, as well as the overarching purpose of case management in provisions such as s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) and s 37M of the Fed
    464 views0 comments

    Daniel Meyerowitz-Katz

    Barrister

    dmkatz@universitychambers.com.au

    +61 2 8227 4400

    University Chambers
    Level 9, 167 Macquarie Street
    Sydney NSW 2000

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin

    ©2018 by Daniel Meyerowitz-Katz. Please do not reproduce without permission from the author. All quotes should be attributed and should include a link to the original. 


    Any information on this website in relation to legal matters is general only and does not constitute legal advice. Nothing on this website should be relied on without first contacting the author to confirm how it applies to your individual circumstances.

    ​

    Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation

    ​

    ​Created with Wix.com